0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Ancient (M2)
Rekordy Ancient
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:29s01:25s
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Zabójstwa za pomocą USP na mapie
31.6027
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
144.8
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
11.93.4
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
14.43.4
Zabójstwa za pomocą Galil kna mapie
41.8164
Obrażenia od Galil (avg/round)
195.9
Asysty na mapie
10.074.4315
Szybka Runda (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Informacja
Map Analysis of Passion UA vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Ancient Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Ancient were jackasmo, who contributed 23 kills, and ZeRRoFIX, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7729 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CPH Wolves on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for CPH Wolves, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Ancient included sausol, who contributed 12 kills, and eraa, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6444 total damage, CPH Wolves couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze