0 Komentarze
94
77
19
+17
412
17:8
21
1
+15%
Przewaga drużyn Ancient (M1)
Rekordy Ancient
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Obrażenia od M4A1 (avg/round)
46.116.7
Zabójstwa za pomocą USP na mapie
41.616
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
164.6
Obrażenia od Tec-9 (avg/round)
11.83.4
Zabójstwa za pomocą M4A1 na mapie
124.6963
Obrażenia od M4A1 (avg/round)
47.616.7
Strzały (total/round)
9216
Obrażenia (total/round)
50073
Wynik gracza (runda)
43881012
Asy gracza
1
Informacja
Map Analysis of Old But Gold vs New Threat by the Bo3.gg Team
Old But Gold on Ancient Analysis
Old But Gold demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Old But Gold on Ancient were Peefy, who contributed 21 kills, and Dante, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 10298 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Old But Gold held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
New Threat on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for New Threat, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for New Threat on Ancient included bilenko, who contributed 18 kills, and Fatality, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8633 total damage, New Threat couldn't prevent Old But Gold from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, New Threat struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze