0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:33s01:25s
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Eco wygrywa pełny zakup
1
Obrażenia (total/round)
40073
Wynik gracza (runda)
42881010
Obrażenia (total/round)
38873
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (przeciwnicy)
2
Zabójstwa kolegów z drużyny
1
Czas trwania oślepienia flashem w rundzie (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Dust II
50%
Inferno
36%
Nuke
27%
Vertigo
20%
Mirage
12%
Ancient
1%
Anubis
1%
Ostatnie 5 map
Dust II
50%
2
16
Inferno
73%
15
20
Nuke
64%
25
26
Vertigo
76%
33
5
Mirage
56%
16
32
Ancient
67%
24
7
Anubis
69%
29
12
Ostatnie 5 map
Dust II
0%
1
31
Inferno
37%
27
28
Nuke
37%
35
26
Vertigo
56%
32
3
Mirage
44%
34
28
Ancient
68%
31
20
Anubis
70%
37
1
Ostatnie wyniki
Informacja
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was brnz4n.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were brnz4n contributed 38 kills and insani contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17496 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were Koala contributed 28 kills and pepe contributed 22 kills. 12438 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze