0 Komentarze
204
200
56
+4
380
28:31
52
5
Nuke6.1
0%
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Składy
Skład
Zastępca
Zastępca
Zastępca
Zastępca
Zastępca
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Overpass
37%
Vertigo
32%
Inferno
23%
Dust II
13%
Ancient
6%
Mirage
4%
Nuke
1%
Ostatnie 5 map
Overpass
62%
26
28
Vertigo
73%
49
4
Inferno
69%
35
15
Dust II
44%
18
44
Ancient
65%
23
9
Mirage
52%
21
45
Nuke
54%
26
19
Ostatnie 5 map
Overpass
25%
12
18
Vertigo
41%
17
11
Inferno
46%
13
28
Dust II
57%
14
9
Ancient
71%
7
15
Mirage
48%
25
6
Nuke
55%
29
4
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wwlww
- lwwlw
Informacja
Match analysis of Lyngby Vikings vs Izako Boars by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lyngby Vikings and Izako Boars, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Nuke, and victory was secured by Lyngby Vikings. The MVP of this match was maNkz.
Lyngby Vikings analytics
The team Lyngby Vikings secured 32 out of 59 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings were maNkz contributed 55 kills and Daffu contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22392 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Izako Boars analytics
The team Izako Boars managed to secure 27 out of 59 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Izako Boars were Vegi contributed 49 kills and Enzo contributed 40 kills. 21957 of total damage by Izako Boars could not prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Izako Boars struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze