0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M1)
Rekordy Inferno
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Obrażenia od koktajla Mołotowa (śr./runda)
6.52
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
13.63.4
Zabójstwa za pomocą M4A1 na mapie
124.6963
Obrażenia od M4A1 (avg/round)
44.616.7
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
12.43.4
Obrażenia od koktajla Mołotowa (śr./runda)
7.42
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
123.8
Szybka Runda (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Obrażenia (total/round)
39073
Wynik gracza (runda)
50081012
Informacja
Map Analysis of Looking For Org vs Paradox by the Bo3.gg Team
Looking For Org on Inferno Analysis
Looking For Org demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Looking For Org on Inferno were ap0c, who contributed 27 kills, and sterling, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10547 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Looking For Org held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Paradox on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Paradox, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Paradox on Inferno included DannyG, who contributed 21 kills, and asap, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8608 total damage, Paradox couldn't prevent Looking For Org from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Paradox struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze