0 Komentarze
88
72
21
+16
410
14:10
25
4
+9%
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M1)
Rekordy Inferno
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:34s01:30s
Obrażenia od Tec-9 (avg/round)
12.83.4
Obrażenia od Galil (avg/round)
16.75.6
Obrażenia od koktajla Mołotowa (śr./runda)
11.52
Rzucenie dymówki na mapie
2315.0371
Obrażenia (total/round)
43673
Wynik gracza (runda)
44761012
Wynik gracza (runda)
36061012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Informacja
Map Analysis of Iron Branch vs The Prodigies by the Bo3.gg Team
Iron Branch on Inferno Analysis
Iron Branch demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Inferno were nifee3, who contributed 16 kills, and MaSvAl, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9846 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
The Prodigies on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for The Prodigies, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for The Prodigies on Inferno included keen, who contributed 20 kills, and P4TriCK, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8365 total damage, The Prodigies couldn't prevent Iron Branch from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, The Prodigies struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze