0 Komentarze
80
63
20
+17
396
11:10
20
2
Anubis6.7
+12%
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Składy
Skład
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Anubis
69%
Nuke
56%
Vertigo
52%
Mirage
50%
Ancient
50%
Inferno
38%
Overpass
30%
Ostatnie 5 map
Anubis
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ostatnie 5 map
Anubis
69%
36
1
Nuke
56%
36
3
Vertigo
52%
21
28
Mirage
50%
40
5
Ancient
0%
0
62
Inferno
38%
24
6
Overpass
30%
23
27
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
Informacja
Match analysis of Hot Headed Gaming vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Hot Headed Gaming and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was Cjoffo.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were Cjoffo contributed 21 kills and nEMANHA contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8318 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hot Headed Gaming analytics
The team Hot Headed Gaming managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hot Headed Gaming were yukitoro contributed 19 kills and Ent1st contributed 17 kills. 6617 of total damage by Hot Headed Gaming could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hot Headed Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze