GODSENT Tablica wyników Inferno (M2)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

13

16

3

-3

74

2:4

3

0

5.6

-13%

10

17

6

-7

74

2:3

2

0

5.3

-10%

9

15

4

-6

56

0:1

1

0

5.1

-25%

10

15

1

-5

49

2:3

2

0

5.1

-27%

3

16

0

-13

17

0:4

1

0

2.9

-57%

Ogółeml

45

79

14

-34

270

6:15

9

0

4.8

-26%

Endpoint Tablica wyników Inferno (M2)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

23

6

1

+17

86

5:0

7

0

8.3

+41%

20

11

3

+9

97

3:2

6

0

7.4

+21%

15

11

5

+4

91

6:2

3

0

7.3

+10%

14

10

6

+4

70

1:0

3

0

6.2

+10%

7

8

9

-1

50

0:2

1

0

4.9

-8%

Ogółeml

79

46

24

+33

393

15:6

20

0

6.8

+15%

Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M2)
Informacja
Map Analysis of GODSENT vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

Endpoint on Inferno Analysis

Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Endpoint on Inferno were CRUC1AL, who contributed 23 kills, and Nertz, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8260 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GODSENT on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GODSENT, as they managed to secure 6 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GODSENT on Inferno included dumau, who contributed 13 kills, and TACO, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5670 total damage, GODSENT couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, GODSENT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze
Według daty