FAVBET Tablica wyników Ancient (M2)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

22

12

4

+10

110

2:1

6

0

8.4

+42%

19

12

8

+7

101

2:0

6

1

7.7

+32%

17

10

6

+7

104

1:1

5

1

7.5

+30%

10

14

6

-4

59

4:4

2

0

5.7

-23%

9

12

2

-3

50

2:2

1

0

5.4

-17%

Ogółeml

77

60

26

+17

424

11:8

20

2

6.9

+13%

Endpoint Tablica wyników Ancient (M2)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

16

16

6

0

99

3:2

5

0

7.0

+11%

15

15

5

0

83

2:0

4

0

6.6

-1%

12

15

5

-3

71

1:0

2

1

6.0

-10%

13

17

9

-4

75

2:5

3

1

5.7

-12%

4

15

1

-11

31

0:4

0

0

3.4

-44%

Ogółeml

60

78

26

-18

359

8:11

14

2

5.7

-11%

Przewaga drużyn Ancient (M2)
Informacja
Map Analysis of FAVBET vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Ancient Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Ancient were Smash, who contributed 22 kills, and bondik, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8053 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Endpoint on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Endpoint, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Endpoint on Ancient included cej0t, who contributed 16 kills, and CRUC1AL, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6822 total damage, Endpoint couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze1
Według daty