0 Komentarze
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Składy
Skład
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Anubis
100%
Ancient
50%
Overpass
35%
Vertigo
33%
Mirage
13%
Inferno
11%
Dust II
10%
Nuke
10%
Ostatnie 5 map
Anubis
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
12
Overpass
44%
16
8
Vertigo
0%
3
12
Mirage
62%
13
2
Inferno
47%
19
4
Dust II
71%
7
3
Nuke
33%
6
7
Ostatnie 5 map
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
50%
2
26
Overpass
79%
19
11
Vertigo
33%
9
10
Mirage
75%
28
1
Inferno
58%
31
2
Dust II
61%
23
1
Nuke
23%
13
7
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- lwlww
- llwlw
Informacja
Match analysis of Eternal Fire Academy vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Eternal Fire Academy and Iron Branch, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Inferno, and victory was secured by Iron Branch. The MVP of this match was sad.
Iron Branch analytics
The team Iron Branch secured 54 out of 54 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Inferno. They also successfully set 15 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch were sad contributed 47 kills and MaSvAl contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21762 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Eternal Fire Academy analytics
The team Eternal Fire Academy managed to secure 0 out of 54 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Eternal Fire Academy were Wicadia contributed 39 kills and jottAAA contributed 34 kills. 18421 of total damage by Eternal Fire Academy could not prevent Iron Branch from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire Academy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze