0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Vertigo (M1)
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Inferno
50%
Ancient
40%
Vertigo
21%
Nuke
16%
Mirage
10%
Anubis
1%
Dust II
0%
Ostatnie 5 map
Inferno
100%
1
3
Ancient
30%
10
0
Vertigo
80%
5
2
Nuke
33%
3
1
Mirage
43%
7
1
Anubis
50%
18
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ostatnie 5 map
Inferno
50%
2
62
Ancient
70%
53
19
Vertigo
59%
44
15
Nuke
49%
51
5
Mirage
53%
40
16
Anubis
49%
43
25
Dust II
0%
2
1
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- lwlwl
- lllww
Informacja
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs Permitta by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Vertigo Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Vertigo were lov1kus, who contributed 18 kills, and sstiNiX, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 7601 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Permitta on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Permitta, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Permitta on Vertigo included morelz, who contributed 10 kills, and Vegi, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5070 total damage, Permitta couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Permitta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze