0 Komentarze
47
74
21
-27
301
5:13
12
2
-1%
Przewaga drużyn Anubis (M1)
Składy
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Overpass
100%
Nuke
45%
Vertigo
42%
Ancient
42%
Anubis
38%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
0%
Ostatnie 5 map
Overpass
0%
1
1
Nuke
0%
1
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Anubis
20%
5
0
Inferno
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
0
2
Ostatnie 5 map
Overpass
100%
1
9
Nuke
45%
11
0
Vertigo
25%
4
5
Ancient
33%
9
1
Anubis
58%
12
0
Inferno
33%
6
2
Mirage
0%
2
3
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wwlww
- lllll
Informacja
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs L&G by the Bo3.gg Team
L&G on Anubis Analysis
L&G demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for L&G on Anubis were j3kie, who contributed 17 kills, and Malkiss, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7483 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, L&G held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included FenomeN, who contributed 13 kills, and sh1nejezzz, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5414 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent L&G from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze