CYBERSHOKE Tablica wyników Dust II (M1)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

15

12

1

+3

83

4:0

3

1

7.0

+17%

14

11

3

+3

71

2:1

3

0

6.2

+12%

15

14

2

+1

66

3:2

5

0

6.0

-6%

10

14

4

-4

65

0:1

1

0

5.1

-13%

5

15

3

-10

33

2:7

0

0

3.4

-36%

Ogółeml

59

66

13

-7

317

11:11

12

1

5.6

-5%

DMS Tablica wyników Dust II (M1)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

28

13

0

+15

120

4:1

7

1

8.9

+54%

10

7

2

+3

59

2:2

2

0

5.8

+2%

10

12

5

-2

52

0:0

2

0

5.1

-16%

9

11

4

-2

56

1:3

3

0

5.0

-8%

9

16

2

-7

53

4:5

2

0

4.8

-19%

Ogółeml

66

59

13

+7

340

11:11

16

1

5.9

+3%

Przewaga drużyn Dust II (M1)
Informacja
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team

DMS on Dust II Analysis

DMS demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for DMS on Dust II were kAlash, who contributed 28 kills, and H1te, who added 10 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7470 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Dust II, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CYBERSHOKE on Dust II Analysis

Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Dust II included FenomeN, who contributed 15 kills, and notineki, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6968 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent DMS from securing victory on Dust II


On the defensive side of Dust II, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze
Według daty