0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Anubis (M2)
Rekordy Anubis
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:26s01:25s
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
11.73.4
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
11.34.1
Zabójstwa za pomocą Desert Eagle na mapie
41.6558
Zabójstwa za pomocą GLOCK na mapie
31.4482
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
12.83.4
Asysty na mapie
13.114.4315
Strzały (total/round)
10716
Multikill x-
4
Informacja
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis were lov1kus, who contributed 19 kills, and levantino, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9248 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CPH Wolves on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CPH Wolves, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Anubis included BøghmagiC, who contributed 16 kills, and Fessor, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8071 total damage, CPH Wolves couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze