0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Anubis (M1)
Składy
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Anubis
70%
Ancient
46%
Dust II
45%
Vertigo
45%
Inferno
44%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
c
33%
Ostatnie 5 map
Anubis
70%
44
2
Ancient
46%
24
1
Dust II
45%
11
11
Vertigo
45%
20
4
Inferno
44%
9
15
Nuke
33%
6
14
Mirage
67%
15
2
Ostatnie 5 map
Anubis
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wwwlw
- wlwl
Informacja
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs coldfeet by the Bo3.gg Team
CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis
CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis were sstiNiX, who contributed 26 kills, and notineki, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8736 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
coldfeet on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for coldfeet, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for coldfeet on Anubis included tappa, who contributed 14 kills, and Heyz1ng, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6913 total damage, coldfeet couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, coldfeet struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze