0 Komentarze
80
77
20
+3
363
14:10
18
2
0%
Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M1)
Składy
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Nuke
60%
Dust II
19%
Inferno
9%
Vertigo
9%
Ancient
7%
Anubis
4%
Mirage
2%
Ostatnie 5 map
Nuke
60%
40
8
Dust II
50%
8
39
Inferno
44%
25
14
Vertigo
38%
21
11
Ancient
50%
86
3
Anubis
57%
47
8
Mirage
59%
71
5
Ostatnie 5 map
Nuke
0%
1
24
Dust II
69%
35
1
Inferno
53%
34
0
Vertigo
47%
19
9
Ancient
57%
28
6
Anubis
53%
34
9
Mirage
61%
23
5
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- wllww
- wllwl
Informacja
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis
CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno were aNdu, who contributed 18 kills, and MAGILA, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8106 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
kONO on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for kONO, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for kONO on Inferno included amster, who contributed 18 kills, and s4ltovsk1yy, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8720 total damage, kONO couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, kONO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze