Bravos Tablica wyników Inferno (M3)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

25

18

9

+7

94

4:3

9

1

7.2

+8%

19

18

5

+1

84

4:1

3

2

6.6

+3%

20

20

5

0

72

5:6

6

0

6.2

0%

21

17

3

+4

77

1:3

6

0

6.1

+7%

16

19

3

-3

63

1:0

3

0

5.7

-18%

Ogółeml

101

92

25

+9

390

15:13

27

3

6.4

0%

Sharks Tablica wyników Inferno (M3)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

27

23

9

+4

98

4:1

6

1

7.6

+9%

21

20

2

+1

63

2:2

6

0

5.9

-11%

15

19

6

-4

72

4:3

2

1

5.9

-1%

15

19

3

-4

67

2:5

3

0

5.3

-6%

13

21

5

-8

57

1:4

2

0

4.7

-22%

Ogółeml

91

102

25

-11

358

13:15

19

2

5.9

-6%

Przewaga drużyn Inferno (M3)
Informacja
Map Analysis of Bravos vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team

Bravos on Inferno Analysis

Bravos demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Bravos on Inferno were JOTA, who contributed 25 kills, and WOOD7, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10930 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Bravos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included Lucaozy, who contributed 27 kills, and zevy, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10016 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Bravos from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze
Według daty