0 Komentarze
Przewaga drużyn Dust II (M2)
Rekordy Dust II
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:25s01:22s
Obrażenia od AK-47(śr./runda)
58.125.2
Obrażenia od Deagle Eagle (avg/round)
18.15.3
Oślepienie flashem na mapie (opp)
4927
Oślepienie flashem na mapie (opp)
5027
Rzucenie dymówki na mapie
1914.1785
Obrażenia od USP (avg/round)
15.74.9
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
11.14.2
Zabójstwa za pomocą GLOCK na mapie
31.4548
Obrażenia od GLOCK (avg/round)
13.84.2
Informacja
Map Analysis of Alliance vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Dust II Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Dust II were Woro2k, who contributed 19 kills, and DemQQ, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7359 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Alliance on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Alliance, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Alliance on Dust II included eraa, who contributed 14 kills, and upE, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6033 total damage, Alliance couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Alliance struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze