ALASKA Tablica wyników Anubis (M2)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

16

16

5

0

83

1:3

6

2

6.7

+8%

15

17

5

-2

79

2:1

5

0

6.1

-1%

13

19

4

-6

75

1:3

2

0

5.3

-15%

12

18

4

-6

66

2:5

2

0

5.2

-11%

11

19

4

-8

56

0:4

2

0

4.7

-22%

Ogółeml

67

89

22

-22

360

6:16

17

2

5.6

-8%

CPH Wolves Tablica wyników Anubis (M2)

+/-

WYNIKI RUND

26

14

7

+12

110

8:0

7

0

8.9

+38%

22

14

6

+8

106

1:1

5

1

7.7

+25%

18

14

7

+4

85

3:2

6

0

6.7

+14%

15

11

3

+4

78

1:2

4

0

6.1

+14%

8

14

7

-6

47

3:1

1

0

5.1

-27%

Ogółeml

89

67

30

+22

426

16:6

23

1

6.9

+13%

Przewaga drużyn Anubis (M2)
Informacja
Map Analysis of ALASKA vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team

CPH Wolves on Anubis Analysis

CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Anubis were b1elany, who contributed 26 kills, and aNdu, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9376 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ALASKA on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ALASKA, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ALASKA on Anubis included Tree, who contributed 16 kills, and arTisT, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7921 total damage, ALASKA couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ALASKA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Komentarze
Według daty