Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
50%
Ancient
35%
Dust II
27%
Mirage
16%
Vertigo
11%
Anubis
10%
Nuke
8%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
8
Ancient
75%
36
0
Dust II
67%
3
1
Mirage
48%
21
0
Vertigo
42%
12
2
Anubis
76%
21
0
Nuke
25%
12
4
Last 5 maps
Inferno
50%
6
14
Ancient
40%
20
1
Dust II
40%
10
9
Mirage
64%
14
2
Vertigo
53%
17
3
Anubis
66%
35
2
Nuke
33%
6
12
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- wlwll
Info
Map Analysis of NAVI Junior vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
NAVI Junior on Ancient Analysis
NAVI Junior demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for NAVI Junior on Ancient were makazze, who contributed 18 kills, and cmtry, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 6688 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, NAVI Junior held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Ancient included notineki, who contributed 13 kills, and levantino, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6400 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent NAVI Junior from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments