Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
196.5798
HE damage (avg/round)
13.73.4
M4A4 kills on a map
123.6448
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.83.8
Player score (round)
42101012
Damage (total/round)
39373
Player score (round)
35201012
Shots (total/round)
11116
Shots (total/round)
9716
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
76%
Inferno
50%
Overpass
50%
Vertigo
42%
Dust II
38%
Nuke
23%
Train
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
76%
17
5
Inferno
50%
16
9
Overpass
50%
6
10
Vertigo
42%
12
13
Dust II
62%
21
0
Nuke
48%
21
3
Train
0%
0
34
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
1
2
Overpass
100%
1
1
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Dust II
100%
3
0
Nuke
25%
4
0
Train
0%
1
2
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs Envy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and Envy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Mirage, Nuke, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was syrsoN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 45 out of 84 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were syrsoN contributed 70 kills and XANTARES contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32312 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Envy analytics
The team Envy managed to secure 39 out of 84 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 11 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Envy were Calyx contributed 69 kills and MICHU contributed 60 kills. 29642 of total damage by Envy could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Envy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments