0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgggg
- ppggg
Avantages des équipes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Lotus
100%
Fracture
50%
Breeze
50%
Haven
40%
Split
33%
Ascent
8%
Bind
0%
Pearl
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Lotus
0%
0
Fracture
50%
2
Breeze
0%
1
Haven
80%
5
Split
17%
6
Ascent
67%
3
Bind
0%
0
Pearl
33%
3
Dernières 5 cartes
Lotus
100%
6
Fracture
0%
0
Breeze
50%
2
Haven
40%
5
Split
50%
4
Ascent
75%
4
Bind
0%
1
Pearl
33%
3
Informations
Match analysis of UCAM Esports Club vs KPI Gaming by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between UCAM Esports Club and KPI Gaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-3, on the following maps: Ascent, Breeze, Split, and victory was secured by KPI Gaming. The MVP of this match was .
KPI Gaming analytics
The team KPI Gaming secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ascent, Breeze, Split. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KPI Gaming were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KPI Gaming held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
UCAM Esports Club analytics
The team UCAM Esports Club managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for UCAM Esports Club were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by UCAM Esports Club could not prevent KPI Gaming from securing the victory
On the defensive side, UCAM Esports Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires