0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
- ppppp
- pgppg
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Fracture
100%
Split
83%
Haven
67%
Bind
50%
Abyss
50%
Lotus
10%
Pearl
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Fracture
0%
3
Split
0%
0
Haven
0%
2
Bind
50%
2
Abyss
50%
4
Lotus
33%
3
Pearl
50%
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Fracture
100%
5
Split
83%
12
Haven
67%
6
Bind
0%
1
Abyss
0%
2
Lotus
43%
7
Pearl
50%
8
Informations
Match analysis of Papara SuperMassive vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Papara SuperMassive and Eternal Fire, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Fracture, and victory was secured by Eternal Fire. The MVP of this match was QutionerX.
Eternal Fire analytics
The team Eternal Fire secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Fracture. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire were QutionerX contributed 20 kills and Izzy contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14209 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Papara SuperMassive analytics
The team Papara SuperMassive managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Papara SuperMassive were skyLeN contributed 20 kills and Touven contributed 12 kills. 11873 of total damage by Papara SuperMassive could not prevent Eternal Fire from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Papara SuperMassive struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires