0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgggg
- ggggg
Avantages des équipes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Pearl
80%
Abyss
67%
Fracture
50%
Split
34%
Haven
11%
Bind
8%
Lotus
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Pearl
0%
2
Abyss
0%
1
Fracture
50%
2
Split
67%
3
Haven
78%
9
Bind
67%
9
Lotus
50%
6
Dernières 5 cartes
Pearl
80%
5
Abyss
67%
3
Fracture
100%
1
Split
33%
3
Haven
67%
9
Bind
75%
4
Lotus
50%
2
Informations
Match analysis of Karmine Corp GC vs SK Nebula by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between Karmine Corp GC and SK Nebula, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Split, Haven, and victory was secured by Karmine Corp GC. The MVP of this match was .
Karmine Corp GC analytics
The team Karmine Corp GC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Split, Haven. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Karmine Corp GC were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Karmine Corp GC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SK Nebula analytics
The team SK Nebula managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SK Nebula were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by SK Nebula could not prevent Karmine Corp GC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SK Nebula struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires