0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggpgg
- pppgp
Avantages des équipes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Lotus
75%
Ascent
50%
Split
42%
Fracture
36%
Pearl
33%
Icebox
33%
Haven
8%
Dernières 5 cartes
Lotus
100%
4
Ascent
50%
6
Split
75%
4
Fracture
86%
7
Pearl
0%
1
Icebox
100%
1
Haven
33%
3
Dernières 5 cartes
Lotus
25%
4
Ascent
100%
3
Split
33%
3
Fracture
50%
2
Pearl
33%
3
Icebox
67%
3
Haven
25%
4
Informations
Match analysis of FUSION vs Skull Cracker by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between FUSION and Skull Cracker, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Lotus, Fracture, Ascent, and victory was secured by FUSION. The MVP of this match was .
FUSION analytics
The team FUSION secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Lotus, Fracture. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FUSION were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FUSION held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Skull Cracker analytics
The team Skull Cracker managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Skull Cracker were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Skull Cracker could not prevent FUSION from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Skull Cracker struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires