0 Commentaires
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgpgg
- pgggg
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Haven
75%
Icebox
60%
Lotus
50%
Abyss
33%
Sunset
27%
Split
20%
Ascent
7%
Bind
0%
Breeze
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Haven
75%
4
Icebox
40%
5
Lotus
100%
5
Abyss
33%
3
Sunset
60%
5
Split
100%
4
Ascent
57%
7
Bind
100%
5
Breeze
0%
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Haven
0%
3
Icebox
100%
1
Lotus
50%
4
Abyss
0%
0
Sunset
33%
3
Split
80%
5
Ascent
50%
2
Bind
100%
4
Breeze
0%
0
Informations
Match analysis of FULL SENSE vs Oblivion Force by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between FULL SENSE and Oblivion Force, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Sunset, Haven, and victory was secured by FULL SENSE. The MVP of this match was JohnOlsen.
FULL SENSE analytics
The team FULL SENSE secured 26 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Sunset, Haven. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FULL SENSE were JohnOlsen contributed 38 kills and foxz contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26954 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FULL SENSE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Oblivion Force analytics
The team Oblivion Force managed to secure 9 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Oblivion Force were Chak contributed 26 kills and riyabtw contributed 20 kills. 17645 of total damage by Oblivion Force could not prevent FULL SENSE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Oblivion Force struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires