0 Commentaires
230
198
81
+32
691
28:32
58
5
Ascent208
215
+1%
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppggp
- ggggp
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Fracture
100%
Split
67%
Bind
67%
Pearl
67%
Haven
38%
Ascent
21%
Lotus
17%
Dernières 5 cartes
Fracture
0%
1
Split
33%
3
Bind
0%
0
Pearl
67%
3
Haven
33%
6
Ascent
50%
6
Lotus
50%
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Fracture
100%
1
Split
100%
1
Bind
67%
3
Pearl
0%
0
Haven
71%
7
Ascent
71%
7
Lotus
67%
3
Informations
Match analysis of CBA vs Acend Rising by the Bo3.gg Team
In the Valorant match between CBA and Acend Rising, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Lotus, Haven, Ascent, and victory was secured by Acend Rising. The MVP of this match was amy.
Acend Rising analytics
The team Acend Rising secured 34 out of 60 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Lotus, Haven. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Acend Rising were amy contributed 53 kills and jademwah contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 41442 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Acend Rising held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
CBA analytics
The team CBA managed to secure 26 out of 60 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for CBA were Xaline contributed 52 kills and Cla contributed 42 kills. 38736 of total damage by CBA could not prevent Acend Rising from securing the victory
On the defensive side, CBA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires