0 Commentaires
114
116
23
-2
357
17:18
28
2
-1%
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3615.0373
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
133.6419
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3515.0373
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
39741012
Dégâts (total/round)
40373
Score du joueur (round)
35461012
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
38491012
Dégâts (total/round)
39673
Informations
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Spirit by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were nEMANHA, who contributed 28 kills, and brutmonster, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 12509 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Spirit on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Spirit, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Spirit on Anubis included donk, who contributed 33 kills, and magixx, who added 28 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12996 total damage, Spirit couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Spirit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires