0 Commentaires
90
80
21
+10
412
11:13
25
1
+7%
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M3)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
17.84.7
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2314.6931
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8171
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
26.15.8
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
166.5888
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke were nEMANHA, who contributed 20 kills, and simke, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9894 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SINNERS on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SINNERS on Nuke included NEOFRAG, who contributed 23 kills, and oskar, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8642 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires