0 Commentaires
78
64
27
+14
376
15:7
22
0
+6%
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M2)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6027
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
16.34.8
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2214.5022
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
124.4189
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
55.516.3
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
13.64.1
Assistances en moyenne par carte
114.4315
Score du joueur (round)
35591010
Score du joueur (round)
47091010
Informations
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Nuke Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Nuke were nEMANHA, who contributed 20 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8264 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
FAVBET on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for FAVBET, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for FAVBET on Nuke included mAriX, who contributed 18 kills, and Smash, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7103 total damage, FAVBET couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires