0 Commentaires
73
67
28
+6
338
12:12
18
3
-1%
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:29s01:25s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2514.5022
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.4
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2314.5022
Tirs (total/round)
8316
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Score du joueur (round)
35071010
Tirs (total/round)
8916
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were nEMANHA, who contributed 19 kills, and brutmonster, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8118 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Inferno included JW, who contributed 16 kills, and HEAP, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7716 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires