0 Commentaires
68
64
20
+4
392
9:11
19
2
+2%
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4456
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
124
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
20.35.8
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Score du joueur (round)
36771011
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were nEMANHA, who contributed 18 kills, and simke, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7843 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included notineki, who contributed 14 kills, and lov1kus, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7033 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires