0 Commentaires
44
76
18
-32
277
9:10
7
0
Inferno4.8
-23%
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
75%
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
67%
Inferno
52%
Nuke
20%
Mirage
20%
Overpass
16%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
75%
12
3
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Ancient
0%
3
11
Inferno
18%
22
1
Nuke
53%
15
2
Mirage
47%
30
1
Overpass
33%
3
11
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
0%
0
3
Vertigo
0%
1
2
Ancient
67%
12
0
Inferno
70%
10
0
Nuke
33%
6
2
Mirage
67%
9
0
Overpass
17%
6
1
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppppg
- ggpgp
Informations
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by ARCRED. The MVP of this match was hurtslxrd.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED secured 19 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCRED were hurtslxrd contributed 19 kills and DSSj contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7773 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 0 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were Cjoffo contributed 11 kills and brutmonster contributed 13 kills. 5258 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent ARCRED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires