0 Commentaires
44
66
15
-22
293
5:13
9
1
-19%
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3022
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.44.9
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
39%16%
Éliminations par grenade HE en moyenne par carte
21.1175
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5128
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:18s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
AMKAL on Dust II Analysis
AMKAL demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for AMKAL on Dust II were AW, who contributed 18 kills, and molodoy, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 6953 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Dust II included Cjoffo, who contributed 13 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5269 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent AMKAL from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires