0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Round rapide (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Score du joueur (round)
41451011
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
3
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
67%
Anubis
63%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
8%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
67%
3
0
Anubis
63%
8
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggggg
- ppgpp
Informations
Match analysis of Zero MarksMen vs Victorum by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero MarksMen and Victorum, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Victorum. The MVP of this match was LUKE4k.
Victorum analytics
The team Victorum secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Victorum were LUKE4k contributed 17 kills and AtomiK contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7807 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Victorum held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero MarksMen analytics
The team Zero MarksMen managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero MarksMen were mooseM contributed 14 kills and mock-_- contributed 12 kills. 6151 of total damage by Zero MarksMen could not prevent Victorum from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero MarksMen struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires