0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
7330
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
51.616
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
23.24.6
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:18s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6730
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.53.4
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
38761012
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Winstrike vs ETHEREAL by the Bo3.gg Team
Winstrike on Dust II Analysis
Winstrike demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Winstrike on Dust II were El1an, who contributed 26 kills, and NickelBack, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8636 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Winstrike held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ETHEREAL on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for ETHEREAL, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ETHEREAL on Dust II included zorte, who contributed 13 kills, and BELCHONOKK, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6594 total damage, ETHEREAL couldn't prevent Winstrike from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, ETHEREAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires