0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:25s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:25s
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.24.1
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
64.225.2
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.14.1
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
18.94.8
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.62.1
Assistances en moyenne par carte
10.034.4315
Dégâts (total/round)
39273
Informations
Map Analysis of W7M vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
Fluxo on Dust II Analysis
Fluxo demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Fluxo on Dust II were arT, who contributed 17 kills, and Lucaozy, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7012 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
W7M on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for W7M, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for W7M on Dust II included t9rnay, who contributed 15 kills, and Jz, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5763 total damage, W7M couldn't prevent Fluxo from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, W7M struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires