0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
52%
Anubis
49%
Inferno
23%
Dust II
20%
Nuke
17%
Ancient
12%
Vertigo
5%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
17%
6
9
Anubis
21%
14
2
Inferno
73%
11
1
Dust II
25%
4
0
Nuke
50%
12
1
Ancient
53%
38
0
Vertigo
38%
13
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
69%
16
2
Anubis
70%
47
2
Inferno
50%
10
17
Dust II
45%
11
12
Nuke
33%
6
17
Ancient
41%
27
1
Vertigo
43%
23
4
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gggpp
- pgpgg
Informations
Map Analysis of Viperio vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
Viperio on Ancient Analysis
Viperio demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Viperio on Ancient were dezt, who contributed 26 kills, and Skrimo, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 11202 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Viperio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Ancient included FenomeN, who contributed 29 kills, and lov1kus, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10791 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent Viperio from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires