Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
143
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
143.8
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
81.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
24.25.6
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
124.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
44.916.7
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:17s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
8030
Échanges en moyenne par carte
9.023.5084
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Informations
Map Analysis of VERTEX vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team
VERTEX on Dust II Analysis
VERTEX demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for VERTEX on Dust II were malta, who contributed 20 kills, and pz, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9667 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, VERTEX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Rooster on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Rooster, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Rooster on Dust II included dangeR, who contributed 16 kills, and asap, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7028 total damage, Rooster couldn't prevent VERTEX from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires