0 Commentaires
70
99
16
-29
337
7:18
17
0
-17%
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M3)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.92
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6830
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
18.83.4
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8064
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.33.8
Score du joueur (round)
37101012
Dégâts (total/round)
44773
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of VERTEX vs Aftershock by the Bo3.gg Team
VERTEX on Inferno Analysis
VERTEX demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for VERTEX on Inferno were Vexite, who contributed 26 kills, and Valiance, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10320 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, VERTEX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Aftershock on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Aftershock, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Aftershock on Inferno included Rickeh, who contributed 19 kills, and HUGHMUNGUS, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8429 total damage, Aftershock couldn't prevent VERTEX from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Aftershock struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires