0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
7.3
4.9
Anubis2.5
Manches gagnées
13
3
Anubis10
Éliminations
73
38
Anubis35
Dégâts
7.29K
4.55K
Anubis2742
Économie
360.15K
249.5K
Anubis110650
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
57%
Overpass
50%
Anubis
50%
Nuke
L
33%
Inferno
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
57%
7
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Anubis
100%
3
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
0
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Anubis
50%
4
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Inferno
100%
1
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgpgp
- gpggg
Informations
Match analysis of TUSTE CHOPAKI vs LOADING by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TUSTE CHOPAKI and LOADING, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by TUSTE CHOPAKI. The MVP of this match was GruBy.
TUSTE CHOPAKI analytics
The team TUSTE CHOPAKI secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TUSTE CHOPAKI were GruBy contributed 19 kills and mASKED contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7488 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TUSTE CHOPAKI held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOADING analytics
The team LOADING managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOADING were AMANEK contributed 11 kills and SIXER contributed 7 kills. 4550 of total damage by LOADING could not prevent TUSTE CHOPAKI from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOADING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires