0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
60%
Overpass
43%
Inferno
36%
Ancient
28%
Dust II
21%
Vertigo
21%
Nuke
14%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
2
3
Overpass
0%
0
4
Inferno
14%
7
1
Ancient
43%
21
1
Dust II
22%
9
5
Vertigo
35%
17
1
Nuke
46%
13
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
60%
5
3
Overpass
43%
14
1
Inferno
50%
2
1
Ancient
71%
28
0
Dust II
43%
7
1
Vertigo
56%
16
0
Nuke
60%
30
0
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
- ppggp
- gpppg
Informations
Map Analysis of PGE Turow vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
PGE Turow on Ancient Analysis
PGE Turow demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 0 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PGE Turow on Ancient were Baljs, who contributed 31 kills, and darko, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 11192 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, PGE Turow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ThunderFlash on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for ThunderFlash, as they managed to secure 28 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ThunderFlash on Ancient included BNK, who contributed 22 kills, and Moon, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9495 total damage, ThunderFlash couldn't prevent PGE Turow from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, ThunderFlash struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires