0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.7
5.8
Nuke0.9
Manches gagnées
16
10
Nuke6
Éliminations
103
81
Nuke22
Dégâts
10.63K
9.16K
Nuke1469
Économie
571.4K
488.3K
Nuke83100
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
L
100%
Ancient
47%
Overpass
40%
Vertigo
36%
Inferno
L
19%
Nuke
L
12%
Dust II
L
3%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
2
3
Ancient
47%
17
1
Overpass
100%
1
2
Vertigo
36%
14
0
Inferno
14%
7
1
Nuke
45%
11
0
Dust II
22%
9
4
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
100%
1
4
Ancient
0%
0
3
Overpass
60%
5
2
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Inferno
33%
3
2
Nuke
57%
14
0
Dust II
25%
4
1
Informations
Match analysis of PGE Turow vs LF0 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PGE Turow and LF0, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by PGE Turow. The MVP of this match was Baljs.
PGE Turow analytics
The team PGE Turow secured 26 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PGE Turow were Baljs contributed 34 kills and noise contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10525 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PGE Turow held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LF0 analytics
The team LF0 managed to secure 0 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LF0 were SP1NT contributed 27 kills and HUckLer contributed 16 kills. 9140 of total damage by LF0 could not prevent PGE Turow from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LF0 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires