0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
113
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2014.5022
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.64.1
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.64.8
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:15s00:36s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5728
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.12.1
Score du joueur (round)
35031010
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of TSM vs ECSTATIC by the Bo3.gg Team
TSM on Inferno Analysis
TSM demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for TSM on Inferno were acoR, who contributed 17 kills, and Zyphon, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8069 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, TSM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ECSTATIC on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ECSTATIC, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ECSTATIC on Inferno included Anlelele, who contributed 14 kills, and n1xen, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6020 total damage, ECSTATIC couldn't prevent TSM from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECSTATIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires