0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M3)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.32
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.62
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4399
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
11.23.8
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Score du joueur (round)
45311012
Tirs (total/round)
9216
Score du joueur (round)
40851012
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of ThunderFlash vs Wu-Tang by the Bo3.gg Team
Wu-Tang on Inferno Analysis
Wu-Tang demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Wu-Tang on Inferno were Szejn, who contributed 27 kills, and maxster, who added 32 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12633 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Wu-Tang held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ThunderFlash on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ThunderFlash, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ThunderFlash on Inferno included bajmi, who contributed 20 kills, and Flayy, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9934 total damage, ThunderFlash couldn't prevent Wu-Tang from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ThunderFlash struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires