0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
113.4
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.63.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
196.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
60.225.3
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.22
Score du joueur (round)
37511012
Tirs (total/round)
9316
Tirs (total/round)
11416
Score du joueur (round)
36251012
Informations
Map Analysis of Third Impact vs GGPR by the Bo3.gg Team
GGPR on Inferno Analysis
GGPR demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for GGPR on Inferno were lowrider, who contributed 22 kills, and Pluto, who added 26 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11200 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, GGPR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Third Impact on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Third Impact, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Third Impact on Inferno included DaneJoris, who contributed 24 kills, and walker, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9888 total damage, Third Impact couldn't prevent GGPR from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Third Impact struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires