0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M1)
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1814.5022
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
31.73.4
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
13.34.1
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6027
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
18.54.8
Score du joueur (round)
36611010
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Informations
Map Analysis of The MongolZ vs AMKAL by the Bo3.gg Team
The MongolZ on Dust II Analysis
The MongolZ demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for The MongolZ on Dust II were bLitz, who contributed 21 kills, and 910, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8268 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, The MongolZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
AMKAL on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for AMKAL, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for AMKAL on Dust II included Sdaim, who contributed 15 kills, and Forester, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6810 total damage, AMKAL couldn't prevent The MongolZ from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires