0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.5
6.4
Vertigo0.9
Manches gagnées
9
16
Vertigo7
Éliminations
74
94
Vertigo20
Dégâts
8.5K
9.79K
Vertigo1293
Économie
440.05K
568.05K
Vertigo128000
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
33%
Overpass
0%
Ancient
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Young Prodigies vs Breiðablik by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Young Prodigies and Breiðablik, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by Breiðablik. The MVP of this match was furious.
Breiðablik analytics
The team Breiðablik secured 25 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Breiðablik were furious contributed 22 kills and wnkr contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9792 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Breiðablik held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Young Prodigies analytics
The team Young Prodigies managed to secure 0 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Young Prodigies were CaPPiNg! contributed 17 kills and Hugo contributed 16 kills. 8499 of total damage by Young Prodigies could not prevent Breiðablik from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Young Prodigies struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires