0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
68%
Mirage
56%
Nuke
55%
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
29%
Anubis
19%
Inferno
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Anubis
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
68%
44
0
Mirage
56%
16
1
Nuke
55%
22
1
Dust II
33%
6
10
Vertigo
29%
7
13
Anubis
31%
26
5
Inferno
0%
2
22
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppppg
- pgppp
Informations
Map Analysis of Souls Heart vs HOTU by the Bo3.gg Team
Souls Heart on Anubis Analysis
Souls Heart demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Souls Heart on Anubis were Wumbo, who contributed 29 kills, and Rezst, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11091 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Souls Heart held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
HOTU on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for HOTU, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for HOTU on Anubis included mizu, who contributed 23 kills, and anttzz, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10216 total damage, HOTU couldn't prevent Souls Heart from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, HOTU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires