0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.53.4
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.4
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2214.5022
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
20.65.9
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.54.1
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.42.1
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
7228
Score du joueur (round)
41661010
Dégâts (total/round)
43273
Informations
Map Analysis of Solid vs Fluxo by the Bo3.gg Team
Fluxo on Inferno Analysis
Fluxo demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Fluxo on Inferno were Nicks, who contributed 20 kills, and zevy, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8478 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Solid on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Solid, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Solid on Inferno included gbb, who contributed 18 kills, and ALLE, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7900 total damage, Solid couldn't prevent Fluxo from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires